Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
hu_jia [2008-11-06 09:38] – nikhu_jia [2008-11-06 09:38] – nik
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 Omission of the National Endowment connection is a serious matter. Self-described by its first leader as carrying on the work of the CIA, the National Endowment receives thirty million U.S. Per year from the U.S. Congress; and its primary work is attempting to destabilize governments, from Venezuela to Russia, which the U.S. state wishes to modify or eliminate.   Interested readers can easily verify this by clicking here: http://www.google.com/searchhl=en&newwindow=1&q=national+endowment+for+democracy+CIA Omission of the National Endowment connection is a serious matter. Self-described by its first leader as carrying on the work of the CIA, the National Endowment receives thirty million U.S. Per year from the U.S. Congress; and its primary work is attempting to destabilize governments, from Venezuela to Russia, which the U.S. state wishes to modify or eliminate.   Interested readers can easily verify this by clicking here: http://www.google.com/searchhl=en&newwindow=1&q=national+endowment+for+democracy+CIA
- + 
 To be clear, receiving money from the National Endowment for Democracy is equivalent to receiving money from the espionage service or intelligence service of a foreign power.   From this perspective, Hu Jia appears not just as an activist but as a witting or unwitting tool of U.S. intelligence. To be clear, receiving money from the National Endowment for Democracy is equivalent to receiving money from the espionage service or intelligence service of a foreign power.   From this perspective, Hu Jia appears not just as an activist but as a witting or unwitting tool of U.S. intelligence.
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
  • hu_jia.txt
  • Last modified: 2008-11-06 12:01
  • by nik